Meeting 100% of Demand
Why plan to meet 100% of demand?
- Are we perpetuating undesired behaviour?
- Are we inducing further undesired behaviour?
- Is further consumption the end goal?
- Will behaviours change anyway?
- By limiting scarcity are we inhibiting investment (by diminishing potential returns)?
- By limiting scarcity are we inhibiting innovation?
- What messages are we sending to markets?
- What messages are we sending to our communities?
Questions worthy of examination?